Discussion:
Synastry between Prince William and Kate Middleton
(too old to reply)
A B
2011-02-07 19:35:07 UTC
Permalink
Yes, I've finally got around to posting some more about the royal wedding.
For reference, here are the relevant data.
Prince William: 21st June 1982, 20:03 GMT
Kate Middleton: 9th January 1982
Their wedding: all things being equal, 29th April 2011, 11:00 am (notice, we
now have a time!)
Composite chart for the two of them: Sun 10 Ari/Lib, Moon 6-13 Can, Mer 6
Ari, Ven 1 Ari, Mar 9 Lib, Jup 4 Sco, Sat 18 Lib, Ura 2 Sag, Nep 25 Sag, Plu
25 Lib, NN 19 Can. I've given two possibilities for the Sun because when
the two Suns are almost opposed, as they are here, one midpoint is almost as
good as the other. 10 Ari is slightly closer to the two Suns than 10 Lib,
but there's only a few degrees in it.

This time I'm looking at the compatibility of the happy couple's charts.
I've not had much practice at synastry, but the aspects between the charts
look excellent to me. I can't be sure about her Moon, because I don't have
her birth time. But it could just be conjunct his - if not, it's at least
in the same sign. Possibly trine his Jupiter, too, or sextile his Venus
(can't be both). And it could well be conjunct his Sun, a well-known
indication for a marriage. Apart from these, I'm sticking to very close
aspects - 2º or less.

Mars features quite often, but in a good way. Her Mars is closely conjunct
his, which seems as good a placing as any. Although there ought to be
plenty of energy in this relationship, hopefully not too much of it will be
aimed at each other's heads. Naturally the planets beyond Mars are all
conjunct too, since there's only six months between the charts. His Mercury
is trine her Mars, and vice versa. Their Mercuries are also trine each
other, making for a rewarding and energetic relationship on a mental level.
It looks as if they can hope for a good friendship as well as a good
marriage - although with his Mercury and Mars both trine her Venus, among
other things, they're in no danger of being "just good friends"!

The Moon's Nodes have a few promising aspects too. The two NNs are just
about conjunct, within 8º. His SN is within 4º of her Sun, while his NN is
definitely within 8º of her Moon and could be closer. Her NN is sextile his
Venus, within 2º. What all this means depends what you think of the Nodes.

Now for the bad news, but there's not very much of it.
IF William's Mars squares Kate's Moon, the danger is that too much
self-assertion or combativeness on his part hurts her feelings -
particularly sensitive in this case, since her Moon is in Cancer. Her Mars
certainly squares his Moon (5º), so the same goes the other way. It's
particularly interesting in this case, since they (probably) both have a
Moon-Mars square in their birth charts - suggesting that sometimes their OWN
aggression can jar on them. On the up-side, Davison ("Synastry") considers
this a good aspect for, ahem, physical attraction.

His MC squares her Mercury and Venus. I think I can guess what THAT means.
The British royal family is a dreadful warning to those who want to be
famous. This engagement has already been postponed once because Kate
couldn't stand the way the press were behaving. That's not going to go
away, though hopefully she's getting more used to it by now. These aspects
imply rather succintly that this level of fame/notoriety would be an ordeal
to anyone with a heart and a brain! Aquarius indicates an independent
character in both that won't take it well at all.

A few quincunxes and semisextiles are also present, but I won't go into
detail because none are much emphasised and I'm not sure what any of them
mean.

But overall, they seem a fine match, if a bit sparky. (And they'll need all
the spark they can get, with the media circus that's coming to them). The
composite chart, on the other hand... well, I'll deal with that later.
--
A. B.
My e-mail address is zen177395 at zendotcodotuk, though I don't check that
account very often.
Kjell Pettersson
2011-03-07 06:01:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by A B
Their wedding: all things being equal, 29th April 2011, 11:00 am (notice, we
now have a time!)
I am not certain that the time 11:00 should be used for their marriage
chart. It is the point in time when the marriage ceremony starts, but
at that point in time they are not yet married. I would prefer using
the actual time of the second party's "I do". According to a gazillion
Hollywood movies everything might change up until that moment! :-)

However, I shall confess I do not ground this upon any kind of
authority beyond my own idea of what should be common sense.

A likely time for the vows would, I think, end up in the ballpark of
half past eleven (11.20 til 11.45), with the reservation that I do not
know much about English marriage ceremony.

/Kjell
A B
2011-03-19 22:24:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kjell Pettersson
Post by A B
Their wedding: all things being equal, 29th April 2011, 11:00 am (notice, we
now have a time!)
I am not certain that the time 11:00 should be used for their marriage
chart. It is the point in time when the marriage ceremony starts, but
at that point in time they are not yet married. I would prefer using
the actual time of the second party's "I do". According to a gazillion
Hollywood movies everything might change up until that moment! :-)
However, I shall confess I do not ground this upon any kind of
authority beyond my own idea of what should be common sense.
A likely time for the vows would, I think, end up in the ballpark of
half past eleven (11.20 til 11.45), with the reservation that I do not
know much about English marriage ceremony.
Good point Kjell. I agree that the exchange of vows seems a more
appropriate time. Unfortunately I don't know when that would be either!
I'd imagine some time after 11:20 and before 1 PM, but beyond that I don't
know. I'll have to check what that does to the chart - I somehow forgot to
take it into account.
--
A. B.
My e-mail address is zen177395 at zendotcodotuk, though I don't check that
account very often.
Todd Carnes
2011-03-20 00:39:55 UTC
Permalink
Unfortunately I don't know when that would be either! I'd imagine
some time after 11:20 and before 1 PM, but beyond that I don't know.
I'll have to check what that does to the chart - I somehow forgot to
take it into account.
Well, there's no way you possibly *can* take that into account until
after it happens. Can you? :)

Todd
A B
2011-03-22 20:48:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Todd Carnes
Unfortunately I don't know when that would be either! I'd imagine
some time after 11:20 and before 1 PM, but beyond that I don't know.
I'll have to check what that does to the chart - I somehow forgot to
take it into account.
Well, there's no way you possibly *can* take that into account until
after it happens. Can you? :)
Why not? I just meant as regards what houses things are likely to be in.
When I last posted about the wedding chart, I assumed they would be married
at 11am, which they won't, so some of what I said about house positions will
be wrong. Of course I don't know exactly what time it WILL be, but I can at
least assume that it won't be before 11:20. (Any advance on that, anyone?)
--
A. B.
My e-mail address is zen177395 at zendotcodotuk, though I don't check that
account very often.
Todd Carnes
2011-03-22 21:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by A B
Post by Todd Carnes
Well, there's no way you possibly *can* take that into account until
after it happens. Can you? :)
Why not? I just meant as regards what houses things are likely to be in.
Well, I'm just saying that until they actually say "I do" there's no way
to know exactly what time to use for the chart, since anything could
happen to affect when that happens.

That's not to say you can't use the planned time for a chart that get's
you "into the ballpark" to get a feel for it. Most likely nothing will
happen to cause any serious delays.

Todd
Todd Carnes
2011-03-22 22:16:41 UTC
Permalink
I assumed they would be married at 11am, which they won't, so some of
what I said about house positions will be wrong.
House cusps move fast. A difference a 3 or 4 minutes can put them off by
a degree or so. I haven't looked at the chart, so I don't know how close
to the end of the signs the cusps are, but it could make a difference.

Todd

Peter Larsen
2011-03-20 10:26:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by A B
Post by Kjell Pettersson
Post by A B
Their wedding: all things being equal, 29th April 2011, 11:00 am (notice, we
now have a time!)
I am not certain that the time 11:00 should be used for their
marriage chart. It is the point in time when the marriage ceremony
starts, but at that point in time they are not yet married. I would
prefer using the actual time of the second party's "I do". According
to a gazillion Hollywood movies everything might change up until
that moment! :-)
The marriage happens when they are pronounced man and wife.

Kind regards

Peter Larsen
Post by A B
Post by Kjell Pettersson
However, I shall confess I do not ground this upon any kind of
authority beyond my own idea of what should be common sense.
A likely time for the vows would, I think, end up in the ballpark of
half past eleven (11.20 til 11.45), with the reservation that I do
not know much about English marriage ceremony.
Good point Kjell. I agree that the exchange of vows seems a more
appropriate time. Unfortunately I don't know when that would be
either! I'd imagine some time after 11:20 and before 1 PM, but beyond
that I don't know. I'll have to check what that does to the chart -
I somehow forgot to take it into account.
Continue reading on narkive:
Search results for 'Synastry between Prince William and Kate Middleton' (Questions and Answers)
7
replies
what makes a cancer fall in love?<3?
started 2009-03-01 03:24:12 UTC
horoscopes
Loading...